|
Home > Climate > Shrub/Grass
Shrub/Grass
Maps and Photos of
shrub/grass range type
Shrub/Grass Climatic Overview
The general climate of the shrub/grass range type of
Alaska is influenced by both maritime and continental weather patterns.
The average annual precipitation varies greatly from location to
location, ranging from approximately 270mm (10.6 in.) to well over
700mm (27.6 in.). Most of the precipitation in this range type is
received late in the season, August, September, and October.
Average precipitation in the spring is very low, sometimes less than
10mm (0.4 in.) creating a potential dry season. The temperature can
range anywhere from -20°C (-4°F) in the winter months to above
25°C (77°F) in the summer months. The warmest days usually
occur between late June and early August, while the coldest days
typically occur in December. A majority of the areas occupied by
the grass/shrub were glaciated during the Pleistocene epoch (Western
Regional Climate Center). The grass/shrub range type can be found
on terrain varying from marshy lowlands, with poorly drained soils and
permafrost, to rolling hills consisting of drier soils. The
accumulation of large amounts of organic matter and discontinuous
permafrost are found throughout the grass/shrub range type in Alaska.
Shrub/Grass Soils
In Alaska the soils of the shrub/grass range type are
Histic Pergelic Cryoaquepts, Histic Pergelic Cryofibrists.
“Histic” indicates that the soil is shallow with poorly aerated organic
material. “Pergelic” refers to temperature regime, indicating the
presence of permafrost; and “Aquept” means poor drainage. Pergelc
Cryochrepts have a mean annual soil temperature of 0°C (32°F).
In all cases the permafrost temperature perennially is at, or below
0°C (Rieger 1983). These soils are under the order of
Inceptisols. Inceptisols form under a variety of climates except
aridic conditions. They are cold soils that often have discontinuous or
continuous permafrost, depending on the elevation, aspect, and latitude
that they are located (USDA et al. 2004). Organic horizons
here are often as thick as one meter, because high moisture contents
and cold temperatures slow the rates of decomposition relative to the
large accumulated organic matter (USEPA 2004). Soils within
this ecosystem generally originated as laucustrian, colluvial, or
glacial till deposits. Inceptisols include soils that have some
subsoil development but lack features of other soil orders (University
of Wisconsin-Madison).
Alaska is primarily comprised of sand, silt and
gravel. Clays are not common because they require more chemical
weathering than normally occurs in Alaska. Fine silts and gravels
are common due to significant erosion related to braided streams,
glacial ice and permafrost. Discontinuous permafrost is common of
the grass/shrub range type found in Alaska. In spaces between tussocks,
the combination of permafrost and fine grained soils accounts for high
soil moisture and frequent appearance of frost scars (Washburn 1973).
Vegetative Community of the Shrub/Grass Range Type
The shrub/grassland is often found as an ecotone
between the wetlands and coniferous forests, located at higher
elevations, in South-central Alaska. In more mountainous areas,
the shrub/grassland exists as an ecotone between the forests within the
valleys and alpine tundra (Smith and Smith 2001).
Vegetation of the grass/shrub range type consists mainly of graminoid
herbaceous and dwarf shrub communities. Shrubs are well adapted
to the low moisture, low soil nutrients, and relatively short growing
season of shrub / grasslands. They withstand these conditions
because they have a lower energy investment aboveground than trees, and
shrubs can rapidly develop root systems, allowing them to take
advantage of water stored in the soil. Herbaceous communities
dominated by tussocks are widespread in the low lying wet areas
(Hagenstein and Rickets 2001). The most common grass species in
Alaska’s shrub / grasslands is bluejoint reedgrass (Calamagrotis
canadensis). It can grow to be 16 - 120 cm (6.3 – 47.2 in.)
tall, is a thick growing, rhizomatous perennial. It has a fair
amount of energy, but is generally low in protein. While in
better drained areas, such as on rolling hills, sedges (Carex spp.)
and dwarfed shrubs, such as crowberry (Empetrum nigrum),
bearberry (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi) and lingonberry (Vaccinium
vitis-idaea), rank as the dominant cover type. Open low scrub
communities consist of green alder (Alnus crispa) and woolly
willow (Salix lanata). Mosses (Drepanocladus spp.) are
also usually abundant (University Corporation for Atmospheric
Research). Shrubs and grasses are well adapted to life in
moisture and nutrient poor soils and harsh conditions, which are
distinctive of many places in Alaska that are in the early stages of
succession, such as glacial moraine and braided riverbeds. The
occurrence of wildfire in the grass/shrub land in Alaska does occur but
is not as common as in other vegetation types. Unlike many of the
rangelands in the lower 48 states, the majority of Alaska’s grass/shrub
range type doesn’t experience problems with overuse or over
grazing. Many of these areas support populations of native
wildlife such as moose (Alces alces), caribou (Rangifer spp.),
bears (Ursus spp.) and other small mammals (Hagenstein and
Rickets 2001).
Current Uses of the Shrub/Grass
The shrub/grassland ecosystems of Alaska cover many
large and diverse parts of the state. Like much of Alaska, large
portions of the shrub/grasslands are uninhabited by people.
However, large portions of shrub/grasslands are located in
South-Central Alaska and the Kenai Peninsula, one of the most populated
regions of the state. Many Native communities are located within
shrub/grass rangeland in Southwest Alaska. Because of its
climate, beauty, and economic opportunities one of the foremost current
uses of the shrub/grasslands is for homes, businesses, and cities.
Because of its close proximity to Alaska’s population
centers, the shrub/grassland is a common recreation area. There
are numerous tourist attractions, amenities, and fishing, hunting, and
other guide services located within this range type. Many people
visit the shrub/grasslands to camp, hike, watch wildlife, canoe, kayak
and much more!
Not only do people take pleasure in and benefit from
the shrub/grassland, but this range type provides habitat for a vast
number of birds and mammals. To a large extent much of this range
type is owned by federal agencies, especially the US Fish and Wildlife
Service and the National Park Service. These areas provide superb
habitat to scores of plant, fish, mammal, and bird species. The
Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge covers 76,890 km2
(19 million acres) of Southwest Alaska, and has 170 species of birds
each year that migrate from 6 continents; 136 of which nest right there
(Alaska Geographic 1981). Other significant federal lands
composed chiefly of shrub/grass rangelands are the Togiak National
Wildlife Refuge, Becharof National Wildlife Refuge, Kenai National
Wildlife Refuge, Katmai National Park and Preserve, and Lake Clark
National Park and Preserve (Alaska Geographic 1981, and USFWS).
Some shrub/grass rangelands are also owned by state agencies or managed
by the Bureau of Land Management (Conservation Biology Institute).
Within these federal lands there are over 40 native
villages with over 30,000 people. Most of these people live a
subsistence lifestyle, depending on the shrub/grassland to
survive. This area supports hunting and trapping for a variety of
birds and mammals. Many of these areas have rich salmon runs and
other species of fish. Native reindeer herders in Southwest
Alaska depend on the grasses of this range type to feed their animals.
Shrub/grassland rangelands are the most common areas
used for agriculture in Alaska. About 121 km2
(30,000 acres) of land, mostly in the Matanuska Valley, Tanana Valley,
and Kenai Peninsula are used for agriculture in the state. About
48,560 km2 (12 million acres) on the Seward
Peninsula are used for reindeer grazing (Parson 2001).
Some regions of this range type have also been used
for mineral and oil extraction. Because much of the land in
Southwest Alaska is held in National Parks and Wildlife Refuges,
exploration and development has been somewhat limited. However,
there are a few companies that mine zinc, lead, and silver in the
southwest region of the state. The Cominco Alaska Corporation
mines about 2 million tons of these minerals from the Red Dog deposit
north of Kotzebue. The Kenai Peninsula on the other hand supports a
good-sized oil and natural gas industry in the Soldotna, Kenai, and
Nikiski area. Until development of the North Slope, this region
produced the most oil in Alaska. Most of the fuel from this
region stays within Alaska and is used by the Alaska Nitrogen Products
Fertilizer Plant, the Tesoro Refinery, Enstar, and other state
electrical companies. Oil and natural gas on the Kenai
contributes to about $100 million dollars into the economy of South
Central Alaska each year (Barrett 2000).
Future Concerns
Because much of the shrub/grassland range type is
highly populated and often visited, one of the greatest risks to it is
degradation due to population increases. Between 1990 and 2000
Alaska’s population increased about 14%, slightly higher than the
national average, and the next 10 years growth is expected to be
similar (University of Alaska-Anchorage). The South Central
region is one of the fastest growing parts of the state. Between
2000 and 2003 the fastest growing region of Alaska was the Matanuska –
Susitna Valley with a 15.2% population increase, followed by Anchorage
with a 4.9% increase, and the Kenai Peninsula with a 2.9% increase in
population (United States Census Bureau). More people means more
pressure on the land and resources for places to live, transportation,
recreation, jobs, and energy needs.
With large population growth in South Central Alaska,
oil and natural gas companies, Unocal and Marathon have been expecting
increases in job and energy needs for the region. They have very
actively been looking for new reserves on the Kenai Peninsula for the
past few years. (Spence 2001) One of the most recent discoveries
was a very large deposit found 72 km (45 miles) south of Kenai (city)
in 2002 (Associated Press). Future goals include heavy
exploration and extraction from the Cook Inlet basin and potentially a
South Central Alaska Oil Pipeline system. Over 50% of the Cook
Inlet watershed is state owned and undesignated, which leaves it
incredibly available to developing energy needs. Increased mining
development is a risk in Southwest Alaska and one of the main
associated concerns is the increase in roads going into these remote
locations and the allied damage (Conservation Biology Institute).
Increase in human populations also adds stress to the
natural areas and animal populations if they are not adequately
regulated. The natural resources of the United States are often
described as being “loved to death” because they are used to the point
where plant and animal populations are impacted and may find a
difficult or impossible recovery. The shrub/grass rangelands are pretty
hearty ecosystems, but like all ecosystems they have areas of weakness,
such as riparian zones and wetlands.
Although there is risk for shrub/grassland depletion,
a major question for Alaska may actually be the increase in shrub
lands. This past summer, fire ripped through over 6 million acres
of Interior Alaska. Shrub/grasslands are one of the heartiest
ecosystems, able to survive practically anywhere. They often
occupy the late primary and secondary stages of succession. Any
land disturbance including logging, mining, glacial recession, or road
building could all lead to the development of shrub/grasslands.
Fragmentation of forests also promotes shrub growth along the forest
interfaces (Smith and Smith 2001).
The increasing average temperatures in Alaska are
increasing the quantity of shrub/grasslands. Over the past 50
years the average temperature in Alaska has risen about 2°C.
The impermeable permafrost layers that underlay much of the
shrub/grasslands may melt as much as 9 m (30 ft.) over the 21st century
(Parson 2001). In several places this means standing surface water will
infiltrate leaving the upper soils much dryer than in the past (Smith
and Smith
2001). The warmer temperatures and smaller acreage of frozen
soils may lead to increased agriculture in South Central and Southwest
Alaska, or current operations may need more irrigation because of
increased water infiltration. Agricultural operations could face
additional problems with warming temperatures, including insect
infestation and invasive plant species.
Shrubs are known for their ability to survive in
challenging areas with minimal moisture. Current research in
Alaska has actually compared photos from the 1940’s with 2004 and the
respective vegetation growing in northern Alaska. Results of this
study show that shrubs have moved northward grew larger, patches
expanded, and patches filled in. In 90% of the
photograph/research locations shrubs were more prevalent than in the
1940’s (Tape 2003?). Research conducted in Colorado used large
heaters
to warm and dry a grassland surface. Over time, they saw the
increase in shrub species, accompanied by a decline in graminoids and
forbs. Scientific research is predicting the northward movement
of shrub lands and boreal forests, meaning many ecological changes for
Alaska (Smith and Smith 2001).
One more possibility associated with warming of the
arctic regions is the increased amount of carbon dioxide (CO2)
being released from arctic soils. With increased temperatures and
decrease in permafrost, more microbial decomposers can survive.
With the large accumulation of organic materials in shrub / grasslands,
this could mean huge amounts of CO2, one
byproduct of decomposition, being released to the atmosphere.
Research conducted at the Harvard Forest in Massachusetts, elevated
soil temperatures by 5°C and found a 60% increase in soil
respiration and a 36% decrease in carbon from the organic
horizon. The research concluded that a huge amount of carbon is
removed from the soil via microorganisms and released into the
atmosphere as CO2, thus increasing greenhouse
gasses and building potential for continued anthropological impacts on
global warming to occur (Smith and Smith 2001).
By Chris Swisher and Kristin Fischer
(editorial revision by John Kawula)
References
Climate
Western Regional Climate Center. n.d. Climate of Alaska. [Online]
Available from http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/narratives/ALASKA.htm
10 Oct.
2004.
Soils
Rieger, Samuel.1983. The Genesis and Classification of Cold Soils.
Academic Press. New York, New York.
United States Department of Agriculture. 2004. Ecoregions of Alaska and
neighboring territories. Forest Health Monitoring Clearing House.
[Online] Available from http://agdc.usgs.gov/data/projects
20 Nov. 2004. [Editorial note: Unable to poen the URL April 18,
2005. This item is likely to be similar to Gallant, A.L. et al.
1995. Ecoregions of Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper
1567. -- JK]
United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Wetland mapping
and classification of the Kenai lowland, Alaska. [Online]
Available from http://www.kenaiwetlands.net
20 Nov. 2004.
University of Wisconsin-Madison. n.d. Inceptisols. [Online] Available
from http://www.soils.wisc.edu/courses/SS325/soilorders.htm
14
Oct. 2004.
Washburn, A. 1973. Periglacial Processes and
Environments. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Vegetation
Hagenstein, R., T. Rickets. 2001. Beringia lowland
tundra. [Online] Available from http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildworld/profiles/terrestrial/na/na1106_full.html
14 Oct. 2004.
Smith, R.L. and T.M. Smith. 2001. Ecology and field
biology. 6th ed. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. n.d.
Alaska Ecoregions. [Online] Available from http://www.ofps.ucar.edu/atlas/ivotuk_CD/reports/ecoregions.htm#_Soils
11 Oct. 2004.
Current Uses
Alaska Geographic. 1981. Alaska’s national interest
lands. Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 67, 111, 116, 154-155.
Barrett, J. 2000. Unocal plans to stay
active on peninsula. Kenai Peninsula Clarion [Online] Available
from http://www.peninsulaclarion.com
15 Dec. 2004.
Conservation Biology Institute. Beringia
lowland/ upland tundra and Cook Inlet taiga. [Online] Available from http://www.consbio.org/cbi/pacnw_assess/er01-02/setting.htm
15 Dec.
2004.
Parson, E.A. 2001. US Global Change Research
Information Office. Potential consequences of climate variability
and change for Alaska. [Online] Available from http://www.gcrio.org/NationalAssesment/10AK.pdf
15 Dec. 2004.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National
Wildlife Refuges: Alaska. [Online] Available from http://alaska.fws.gov/mission.htm
15 Dec. 2004.
Future Concerns
Associated Press, Anchorage. 2002. Unocal
strikes onshore gas discovery. Kenai Peninsula Clarion Online.
Available from http://www.peninsulaclarion.com
15 Dec. 2004.
Smith, R.L. and T.M. Smith. Ecology and field
biology, 6th ed. 2001. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings, pp.
577-600, 700-703.
Spence, H. 2001. Land leased in oil gas
pursuit. Kenai Peninsula Clarion Online. Available from http://www.peninsulaclarion.com
15 Dec. 2004.
Tape, K. 2003? A half-century of change in arctic
alaskan shrubs: a photographic-based
assessment. [Online] Available from http://www.laii.uaf.edu/warming/warming.cfm
15 Dec. 2004.
United States Census Bureau. Alaska population
change: 2000-2003. [Online] Available from http://www.epodunk.com/top10/countypop/copop2.html
15 Dec. 2004.
United States Geological Survey. Biology:
Southwest Alaska. [Online] Available from http://biology.usgs.gov/stl/snt/noframe/ak177.htm
15 Dec. 2004. [URL no longer available April 18, 2005.]
University of Alaska Anchorage Strategic Planning. Alaska
population growth. [Online] Available from http://www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/pest/content_index.html
15 Dec. 2004.
|