Section 1
Executive Summary
The
2002 Campus Master Plan for the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF)
established five primary goals for the campus, with an emphasis on access
and circulation for the university and surrounding community. To achieve
these goals, the Campus Master Plan identified 25 actions ranging from
landscaping and signing improvements to developing new facilities. Several
of the 25 actions pertain specifically to parking and multi-modal circulation.
Implementation of the actions is intended to improve the efficiency of
the parking system, mitigate vehicular access and circulation deficiencies,
and improve pedestrian connectivity and continuity. The purpose of the Circulation and Parking Plan is to provide additional
guidance toward implementing the transportation related items in the
Campus Master Plan. To this end, UAF formed the Circulation and Parking
Subcommittee (CPS) to identify specific issues and mitigation measures
to address near-term and long-term needs related to pedestrians and bicycles,
the UAF shuttle system, motor vehicle circulation, and the parking system.
As such, this project required technical data collection and analysis,
as well as a qualitative review of the issues and potential improvements.
CPS hired a team of consultants to provide expertise in the areas of
transportation planning, traffic engineering, economics and finance,
and landscape architecture. A public involvement process was undertaken,
which included two public meetings and an on-line survey posted on the
UAF web site. Additional comments were taken directly by members of the
CPS. Implementation actions were evaluated for both technical soundness and
appropriateness for the character and goals of the campus community.
The resulting Plan includes a wide range of measures to improve circulation
and parking throughout the UAF campus. It also includes a range of strategies,
from significant infrastructure changes to pedestrian enhancements to
modified parking management measures. Many of the measures are tied to
existing campus plans, such as the completing Tanana Loop, constructing
Thompson Drive and the Visitors’ Kiosk, as well as to building
sites identified for future development. In addition, changes to the
existing parking permit system are identified to optimize use of existing
facilities. The major recommendations are summarized below. Following these are
sections describing the project purpose and process; assessing existing
and future access and circulation systems; and recommending plans for
non-motorized, motor vehicle, shuttle, and parking system. Major Non-Motorized Circulation Recommendations
The primary recommended pedestrian enhancements include changes on Yukon
Drive, constructing dedicated paths connecting the SRC to West Ridge/Butrovich
and Residential Areas to SRC, extending the walkway in front of the Moore/Bartlett/Skarland
(MBS) Complex to Patty Center, a formal walkway along Kuskokwim to Yukon
Drive, and covered walkways from the parking lots on Taku Drive to Tanana
Loop. These can be very expensive. Yet the demand is well established and
these connections are necessary to establish a comprehensive, safe, and
well-connected pedestrian system. The recommended non-motorized circulation
improvements are identified below. More details can be found in the body
of this Plan.
1. Yukon Drive Pedestrian Improvements
Design improvements on Yukon Drive will enhance the multi-modal environment
in conjunction with Tanana Loop completion. Improvements include limiting
motor vehicle access points, and providing wider sidewalks and bikeways.
Improvements may also include narrowing the motor vehicle travel-way.
2. Tanana Loop Completion
Completion of the north section of Tanana Loop will connect West Ridge,
the residential areas, Lower Campus, and the North Campus area with a
more efficient and direct route around campus. Separate dedicated pedestrian
paths or adjacent sidewalks will be constructed along the whole of Tanana
Loop. Bike lanes or wide paved shoulders will also be provided along
the entire length of the loop. Road design will also include appropriate
access points and crossings to provide for safe and efficient movement
between the core campus and the North Campus Area.
3. West Ridge Pedestrian Priority Area
The Campus Master Plan identifies the West Ridge Plaza as a future open
space. UAF should develop the pedestrian plaza as planned. Limited on-street
parking could be considered along Koyukuk Drive for short-term visitors
to allow easy accessibility for visitors.
4. Pedestrian/Bicycle Connection Between Student Recreation Center/Nenana
Lots and West Ridge
The lack of a formal pedestrian path between West Ridge and SRC/Nenana
Lots was one of the most frequently mentioned pedestrian system deficiencies
indicated in the UAF web survey. Aerial photography reveals numerous
informal trails between the two locations. Several improvements for pedestrian
and bicycle connections are described in the body of the plan.
5. Pedestrian Connection from Moore-Bartlett-Skarland to Patty Center
and Lower Campus Residential Area
Given the high amount of use this connection receives, the existing
pedestrian walkway down to Ambler Lane should be covered. In addition,
a formal pedestrian facility should be provided extending the MBS Complex
stairway to the Patty Center. While this cost is considerable, it would
provide an essential link in the pedestrian system with significant connectivity,
convenience, and safety benefits.
6. Sidewalk Connection on Kuskokwim Way Between Yukon Drive and Hess
Village
Provide a formal dedicated walkway on Kuskokwim Way between North Chandalar
and Yukon Drive. It could be constructed separately or in conjunction
with the paving of Kuskokwim Way. The walkway should also connect to
the MBS parking area to provide a continuous pedestrian connection from
the parking lot to Yukon Drive.
7. North Chandalar Extension
The Campus Master Plan identifies the potential extension of North Chandalar
to connect to Kuskokwim Way. This is included in the motor vehicle portion
of this plan. However, any future extension of this roadway is solely dependent
upon the type of development that takes
place in the North Chandalar area. Regardless of whether or not motor
vehicle access is allowed, North Chandalar should be extended as a pedestrian/bicycle
route.
8. Pedestrian Crossing at Nenana Lots
Pedestrian crossing conflicts were identified on Tanana Loop north of
the Nenana Lots. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that peak vehicular
arrivals at the parking lot coincide with the peak traffic volume on
Tanana Loop. With the closure of Fairbanks Street, the major left-turning
movement from this intersection will shift from Tanana Loop along Nenana
Lots to Thompson Drive and will bypass the Nenana Lots. This will reduce
the potential for pedestrian/vehicle conflicts to some degree. Several
additional recommended mitigation measures, include narrowing Tanana
Loop in this section, and improving sidewalks on the south side of Tanana
Loop toward South Chandalar.
9. Pedestrian Conflicts with Vehicles in Front of Signers’ Hall
Given this is one of the highest volume pedestrian areas on campus
and pedestrian volumes are expected to increase in the future, the
majority of this parking lot should be removed. Limited visitor parking
could be provided directly adjacent to Signers’ Hall.
10. Pedestrian Crossing and Pedestrian Path on Taku Drive at Tanana
Loop
The existing Tanana Loop/Taku Drive intersection is characterized by
a steep grade on the east leg of Taku Drive, a skewed intersection, and
poor sight distance due to curvature of Taku Drive. Vehicles on Taku
Drive do not have to stop before going through the intersection. Taku
Drive should be closed to through traffic (identified in the motor vehicle
plan). Additional measures are described in the body of the plan
11. Pedestrian Grade on Taku Drive from Parking Lots
The ‘serpentine’ pedestrian path provided along Taku Drive
is steep and slippery during the winter months. Several measures to
improve the safety of this connection include provision of a covered
path and/or replacing the walkway with steps. A covered walkway should
be constructed across Tanana Loop.
12. Other Pedestrian Facility Improvements for Consideration
Because of the cold-weather environment and steep terrain, pedestrian
accessibility is complicated. UAF should consider special design features
for future projects. As the campus population increases in the long-term
future, the value of these improvements may increase, particularly if
the campus is to increase the emphasis on non-motorized circulation modes
and peripheral parking locations. Development activity may present opportunities
to install more extensive pedestrian systems.
Protected pedestrian connections should also be considered for integration
with all new buildings in the campus core. These could include underground
tunnels, heated sidewalks, covered and/or enclosed walkways, or pedestrian
bridges.
13. Other Bicycle Facility Improvements for Consideration
Bicycles are a bona fide presence on the UAF campus. Provisions for
bicycle parking and storage must be provided. Bicycle facility improvements
must be esthetically pleasing, convenient and functional.
14. Pedestrian Conflicts with Vehicles in the Salcha Drive/South Chandalar
Area
Improve pedestrian safety at the intersection of Salcha Drive and South
Chandalar by installing a pedestrian crossing signal at this location.
Major Motor Vehicle Recommendations
The motor vehicle system is the primary mode of transportation for students
and faculty for getting to and from campus. Some of the key recommendations
for the motor vehicle system relate to opportunities created by the Tanana
Loop extension. The Tanana Loop extension will have many impacts
on the UAF circulation system, as identified above. It also provides
an opportunity to mitigate existing intersection problems at the western
Taku Drive/Tanana Loop intersection. With the new roadway connection,
Taku Drive can be closed to through vehicles to alleviate the sight distance
problems associated with the steep grade and curvature of Taku Drive.
Closing the road would also further shift vehicle traffic away from Yukon
Drive.
In addition, several potential mitigations were identified for “Malfunction
Junction.” However, the cost of these suggested solutions is very
high. Given that traffic operations are expected to remain acceptable,
and in the absence of any known safety problem, none of these mitigations
is recommended.
The recommendations for the motor vehicle system are summarized below.
1. Tanana Loop Alignment and Design
Completion of Tanana Loop will connect West Ridge, the residential areas,
and the North Campus area, as well as provide a safer and more efficient
route between West Ridge and Lower Campus for vehicular traffic. By directing
traffic to Tanana Loop, Yukon Drive becomes more of a pedestrian route,
thereby improving pedestrian welfare and safety. Tanana Loop must be
designed principally to serve campus needs and not to invite cross-campus
traffic unrelated to UAF. The design for the route must include efforts
to mitigate impacts on the research, education and recreation activities
in the North Campus area. As well, access points and crossings for safe
and efficient non-motorized movement between the core campus and the
North Campus Area must be part of the design.
2. Yukon Drive Multi-Modal Enhancements
Yukon Drive serves as the central connector for all modes of travel,
carrying high volumes of pedestrian and bicycle travel. Specific multi-modal
enhancements suggested in conjunction with the Tanana Loop extension
would significantly reduce motor vehicle volumes and travel speeds on
Yukon Drive, consistent with the pedestrian priority treatment identified
in the Campus Master Plan.
3. Tanana Loop/Western Yukon Drive Alignment at West Ridge
In conjunction with the Tanana Loop extension project, the alignment
of the western ends of Tanana Loop and Yukon Drive on West Ridge is
expected to be modified to provide a clearer
line of sight for drivers on Yukon Drive, improving intersection sight distance
and overall safety at the intersection for all approaches.
4. Natural Sciences Facility Connection to Tanana Loop
The 2002 UAF Campus Master Plan shows a planned extension of the Natural
Sciences Facility access road from the Natural Sciences parking lot
north to the future Tanana Loop extension. The intent of this extension
is to provide access from Tanana Loop to the Natural Sciences Facility
parking area. This will help to reduce traffic on Yukon Drive. For
these reasons, this extension is recommended, as shown in the Campus
Master Plan.
5. North Chandalar Avenue Extension
The extension of North Chandalar Avenue to Kuskokwim Way, as identified
in the Campus Master Plan, would further improve connectivity and circulation
for areas north of Yukon Drive and for residential areas. This connection
would not substantially impact traffic on Yukon Drive but would facilitate
potential residential development west of Kuskokwim Way and could allow
for efficient shuttle serve to serve residential uses. Any future extension
of this roadway is solely dependent upon the type of development that
takes place in the North Chandalar area and, to a much lesser degree,
west of Kuskokwim Way.
6. Thompson Drive and Roundabout Intersection at Tanana Loop/West
Tanana (Farm Road)/Thompson Drive
A new roundabout intersection is under construction in the southwest
portion of campus at the new Thompson Drive intersection with Tanana
Loop/West Tanana (Farm Road). An analysis of weekday a.m. and p.m.
peak hour traffic operations indicates that the roundabout will operate
acceptably with 2010 background traffic volumes. With the new entrance
at Thompson Drive, considerations should be given to gateway signage
treatments and installing a visitor/information center along Thompson
Drive between Geist Road and Tanana Loop.
7. Taku Drive/Tanana Loop Intersection Issues
The intersection of Taku Drive and Tanana Loop is located such that
the grade and surrounding land topography create intersection sight
deficiencies. Taku Drive west of the Cooperative Extension Service
building should be closed to through traffic other than shuttle buses
and emergency vehicles. The closure should not occur before the Tanana
Loop extension is completed.
8. Kuskokwim Way from Yukon Drive to North Chandalar
The short unpaved segment of Kuskokwim Way was identified in the recent
UAF student, faculty, and visitor survey as a motor vehicle concern.
This segment of roadway should be paved and dedicated pedestrian walkways
should be provided.
9. Wickersham Hall/Gruening Passenger Drop-off
Drivers frequently use the parking area located near Wickersham Hall
and the Gruening Building as a passenger drop-off area. Due to the
relative layout of the parking lot and dumpster and UAF Facilities
Services parking space locations, circulation is limited. Remove all
parking except for handicapped spaces, and remove the dumpsters to
allow more safe and efficient movement of vehicles. Explore feasibility
of creating a circular turnaround in this area.
10. Include short-term parking spots (10 min. or less) at locations
which are convenient to major buildings throughout campus
In order to implement a successful perimeter parking system, it is
essential that short-term parking be available so that faculty, staff,
students, and visitors can drop off items in buildings.
Major Shuttle Recommendations
The shuttle system evaluation revealed that the shuttle currently
provides good service to most connections where there is demonstrated
demand. In the near term, minor system tweaks may be most appropriate
to optimize service. However, as parking is shifted toward the perimeter
of campus, a bi-directional loop route is recommended to most efficiently
serve all origin-destination pairs. It is expected that the existing
fleet could accommodate such a route structure while maintaining acceptable
service frequency. However, UAF should anticipate increasing the fleet
by one to three vehicles to maintain sufficient service frequency as
the shift toward the perimeter is achieved. Capacity constraints may
dictate the need for additional vehicles.
The major shuttle recommendations are summarized below.
1. Shuttle Capacity and Frequency Considerations
Increase shuttle capacity by expanding fleet and implementing vehicle
design changes (add second door; larger low-floor vehicles; increased
seat pitch; longitudinal seating) taking cost considerations into account.
2. Shuttle Handrails
For safety reasons, UAF does not currently allow riders to stand while
the shuttle is in motion. This constrains capacity. Retrofit existing
vehicles with hand straps to increase capacity; handrails and wrist
straps could be included as options for new vehicles.
3. Shuttle Service Hour/Seasonal Modifications
To better address needs of students, faculty and staff, begin fixed-route
shuttle service at 7am rather than 7:30. Expanded summer service should
be considered. Fixed-route service should be expanded during winter
and spring breaks.
4. Shuttle Service Reliability Strategies
Achieving both actual and perceived service reliability is critical
to the success of any transit service. Several measures are recommended,
including full-time dispatch personnel, centralized demand-response
requests, phones in warming huts, and time-point shuttle scheduling.
5. Shuttle Route Connectivity Strategies
The current fixed-route shuttle system is oriented toward providing
point-to-point connections: either from a specific parking lot to a
specific activity center, or between West Ridge and Wood Center. Some
pairs of campus activity zones are not directly connected by the shuttle
system. Priority connectivity options for future shuttle routes should
include: West Ridge to Recreation Area/Nenana Lots Connection; West
Ridge and Lower Campus Connection with additional stops; and fixed-route
service to residential areas.
6. Shuttle Funding
The assessment of the funding for the shuttle system showed that most
colleges and universities with ‘prepaid’ shuttle service
rely on broader revenue sources, including student fees. UAF should
consider a full range of funding sources, including charging student
fees for shuttle service in order to ensure that convenient and reliable
service can be provided.
7. Future Transit Considerations
The UAF transit system currently comprises the shuttle fleet owned
and operated by UAF, with linkages to the FNSB transit system. As the
Campus Master Plan goal of shifting parking to the campus perimeter
is realized, it will be necessary to provide convenient and safe connections
between parking areas and the campus core. Changes to be considered
would be a bi-directional loop system, new routes for the FNSB transit
system that would serve West Ridge, and perhaps a light rail transit
service between the west and east ends of campus.
Major Parking Recommendations
Parking management design of new parking facilities plays an important
role in both the accessibility and development of the campus. Major parking
strategies are discussed in terms of parking development and management
measures in the paragraphs below.
1. Parking
Management Designations
A modified parking permit system is recommended. Different parking designations
(lots, as opposed to spaces) will include premium, general, economy,
residential and visitor. The objectives of the modified system are to
increase utilization of existing facilities and to encourage campus residents
to leave their cars parked in perimeter locations during weekday school
hours. It also provides a pricing incentive to park in the perimeter
and use the shuttle system. All economy parking lots must be electrified
and have shuttle service for this system to be most effective.
2. Future Parking Development
Increased efficiency of existing parking facilities is the first priority
of the parking system plan. Nevertheless, there will be a need to develop
additional parking facilities in the future in order to accommodate anticipated
population growth and to replace parking that may be removed for redevelopment.
Parking demand is expected to increase by approximately 840 vehicles
by the year 2010. Most of the growth is expected to occur in West Ridge
due primarily to expanded research facilities. Based on a target campus-wide
parking utilization of 80%, and assuming that existing surpluses could
be better utilized, it is estimated that approximately 415 parking spaces
would have to be constructed to meet parking needs associated with future
growth.
In addition, several existing parking lots have been identified for
potential redevelopment for pedestrian enhancements or as building sites.
The total parking lost if all of these were to occur would be up to approximately
400 spaces. Approximately of these spaces are in prime locations in Lower
Campus.
Generally speaking, UAF should consider the following options with respect
to future parking development for Lower Campus:
- Provide parking within structures to serve Lower Campus. These could
be provided in parking levels in conjunction with future classroom
and administrative buildings.
- Provide all replacement spaces in the campus perimeter (mostly North
Tanana Loop) with an understanding that nearly all staff and faculty
will have a much lower level of service with respect to parking.
- Reconsider some of the proposed parking removals within Lower Campus
in order to retain adequate parking.
- Given that Lower Campus has relatively high parking utilization at
present (non-restricted spaces were over 90% utilized in the peak hour),
UAF should be proactive in addressing issues related to the potential
removal of more than half of the existing parking supply.
3. Additional Parking Management Considerations
There are special user groups with specific parking needs or other characteristics
that must be addressed. Most importantly, parking for commuter students
is a critical consideration. The campus population is comprised of over
50% commuters, and the current parking system does not serve their needs
well. In addition, carpool parking options should be explored along with
community visitor permits and overnight parking restrictions.
4. Long-Term Parking System Management
Over time, Parking Services will need to monitor parking demand and
may need to shift designations, and/or modify supporting shuttle services.
Periodic utilization studies should be conducted to evaluate conditions
in comparison to the target utilization level for each area. This will
provide an objective measure of parking operations, and reduce reliance
on user perceptions to identify deficiencies. However, input from users
will continue to provide guidance toward modifications in other aspects
of the parking system.
Conclusion
This plan presents a framework that can help UAF maintain safe and efficient
accessibility and circulation well into the future. While many specific
improvements have been identified, the plan is by necessity flexible. Many
future investments will have to be evaluated based on the opportunities,
priorities, and specific needs of the time. UAF should anticipate updating
the Circulation and Parking Plan as the campus environment changes in relation
to population growth, new building development, and additional infrastructure
investments.

|