To introduce the moral and ethical considerations of animal use, particularly in a research setting, and the directed concerns of opponents to animal use in research, teaching, and testing.
The purpose of this section is not to convince you that animals should be used in research, teaching, and diagnostics but to stimulate discussion and thought about how we use animals. If you are taking this web-based course, you are presumably involved or plan to be involved in some protocol or project that uses animals. Therefore, you already recognize the importance of animal use at some level (hopefully not too narrow!). It is absolutely critical for individuals who use animals for one or more purposes to give some thought to how animals are used in general and to guard against hypocrisy in your personal feelings toward animal use. For example, it is alarmingly common for people working in biomedical research to view aspects of wildlife management or wildlife research with some disdain. The idea of placing a cannula into a rat's brain is justifiable since the intent is to advance medical knowledge yet trapping a marten in a leghold trap for a mark-recapture study might be considered cruel. Likewise, it is equally common for individuals conducting wildlife research to consider some procedures used in biomedical research as barbaric. It depends entirely upon your personal experience, how you justify your own animal use, and whether or not you believe the propaganda published about animal cruelty and abuse - there is a lot of misinformation! For most of us, we are well aware that the "animal rights" portrayal of our own use of animals is incorrect. Therefore, it is safe to assume that ALL their reports and so-called "fact" sheets are incorrect.
In previous classes I have asked my students to list how humans use animals. The exercise was primarily to get students thinking about animal use from a variety of viewpoints and to recognize that acceptable animal use is very diverse. The other important component of this exercise was to get students thinking about how different forms of animal use is regulated and where abuses, if any, might occur. This resulted in what I think is a fairly exhaustive listing of different ways in which humans use animals. If you can think of a form of animal use that we missed please let me know and I will add it to the list. As a society we have decided that some uses are simply wrong, animal fighting is an obvious example. However, our society has decided that there are many, many uses of animals that are acceptable. As a researcher what should you do? Claiming that animals have rights is quite inappropriate. This is a real quagmire that is best avoided, regardless of your personal sentiment. How you deal with the semantics is a very personal issue and I don't expect you to alter your philosophy towards animals. Nevertheless, claiming that animals have rights places you in the same camp as the terrorists who "liberate" research animals and send nasty letters and e-mails to animal users like you and me. Many individuals that I have met who claim that animals have rights really don't adhere to the animal rights philosophy at all. They have the misguided idea that animal welfare is achieved by an animal rights philosophy - this is not so! Most people understand that humans use animals, they simply expect animals to be used in a humane fashion. The individuals who truly believe in animal rights want to stop all use of animals no matter how important or useful to humans.
Biomedical vs. Non-medical: Use of animals, particularly in research is often identified as to whether it is biomedical research or non-medical research. Some feel that animal use is more easily justified if it will directly lead to knowledge about improving human or animal health. However, non-medical is equally valuable because it increases our knowledge about living organisms. Moreover, some research that might initially be considered non-medical can lead to discoveries that will contribute to medical research.
Basic vs. Applied: Justification of your use of animals is paramount in protocol review and for obtaining funding to conduct your research. A third classification of research tends to be whether it is basic or applied. Again, for animal protocol reviews this distinction is irrelevant, Your goal is to justify what you are proposing; however, some feel that applied research is easier to justify and, for some funding sources, they require an applied component to your research prior to funding.
Whatever your affiliation with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, always consider the positive aspects of animal welfare in every type of animal use that you are involved with. Promotion of a high standard of care and animal well-being results in high quality scientific results and maximizes the use of sparse research dollars. It is also extremely important from a University Relations viewpoint to let the public who supports us know that we treat our animals in a humane fashion.
Be fairly open about your work and try to give a positive outlook. Remember to provide information in a judicious manner because, taken out of context, some animal research activities can be wrongly portrayed as cruel. This applies to every form of animal use including pet ownership! It is important to maintain dialogue with animal welfare groups and to be proactive in educating the public in the humane care and use of animals. Concealing or being overly secretive about the research we do only fosters suspicion that we have something to hide and that we are abusing animals. We must get the message out that it is possible to use animals and still care and feel compassion for them. Many individuals still think that researchers can "do whatever they want to animals". This is obviously not true but is a common viewpoint despite the fact that animal research is one of the most heavily regulated form of animal use in the United States.
Don't ignore "attacks" on other uses of animals because you might be next. Be tolerant of other viewpoints. It is worth the time to read about some of the animal rights organizations and to explore their philosophies.
Almost every scientific organization that uses animals in research or conducts research upon animals has set out a resolution. Be sure to read the resolution set by your own scientific organization.
There are many good Animal Welfare Organizations that promote the humane use of animals. Consider membership in organizations like these rather than Animal Rights organizations.
For those of you who feel that the current animal rights movement has led to all the current legislation and the "new sense of morality towards animals" - think again. Russell and Burch's The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique which describes the 3 R's discussed below were published in 1959, the Animal Welfare Act was passed in 1967, and the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals was first published in 1963. All these milestones addressing the welfare of animals used in research occurred long before the current animal rights movement was started with the 1974 publication of Peter Singer's book Animal Liberation. It is incorrect to state that animal activism has no effect on legislation and attitudes towards animals; however, animal welfare is an issue long promoted by many individuals within the scientific community.
The hypocritical outlook of animal rights has clouded the important issues. Excellent examples of this hypocrisy can be found in many places. Visit the Animal Research Facts area at the Foundation for Biomedical Research web site.
Of course the anti-vivisection movement has been around since the late 1800's. The common statement from then is still prevalent: "We must stop the use of animals because we have learned all we can from research conducted on animals." Thankfully, the scientific community and the public supporting animal research did not listen to these misguided people or we would have missed all the major medical breakthroughs of the last century and our standard of living would not have advanced as it has! If you are unsure about this, read "The Payoff from Animal Research" at the Foundation for Biomedical Research web site. Think of what is still to be discovered!
Today's Animal Rights/Animal Liberation Movement:
For your entertainment and so you can see what is being said about you, visit the web sites for some of the Animal Rights organizations (never download anything from these sites!):
Visit Animal Rights.Net for some essays critical of the animal rights movement.
Animal Rights does not provide for or ensure Animal Welfare!
The use of animals in biomedical research and quite a lot of basic biological research is only permitted if there are no acceptable non-animal alternatives. This is most applicable to the use of animal models for human disease or for the study of specific physiological mechanism. However, it is common in basic biological research, wildlife research, or agricultural research that the whole animal or some group of animals is the object of study. For studies like this, contemplation of non-animal alternatives seems rather foolish, however, the researcher is still obliged to justify their use of animals and to consider alternatives to any procedures that may cause even momentary pain or suffering.
The issue of alternatives is a very important one and absolutely must be addressed in the IACUC Assurance of Animal Care form. This topic will be addressed in more detail when we go over the form itself.
There have been considerable advances in recent years to establish non-animal alternatives for biomedical research or, at the very least, to replace studies that previously used "higher" organisms with creatures lower on the phylogenetic scale. Many invertebrate and fish models provide alternatives to the use of rodents, cats, dogs, and even non-human primates. However, non-animal alternatives or use of animals lower on the phylogenetic scale cannot entirely replace live vertebrates in biomedical research but it can reduce the numbers used.
For more information on alternatives:
As a researcher or an individual using animals in a research, teaching, or diagnostic setting you are expected to fully justify your use of animals and adhere to Russell and Burch's 3 R's: reduction, refinement and replacement.
All the control or oversight currently in place today revolves around the Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training. Read these nine principles and you will have a basic understanding of the moral issues in question and the basis for all the animal care requirements that you are subject to.
There are many Acts, Regulations and Guidelines governing the use of animals in the United States and we are required to work in accordance with all of them. If you feel the urge to complain - don't bother. It is a waste of time and energy for you and the poor person who has to listen to you. If you wish to change things then I strongly encourage you to get involved with your own scientific organization and work to bring about change. There is already an effort to reduce the regulatory burden but it will take involvement from researchers.
This list contains a wide variety of articles, books and letters but it is by no means complete. There has been quite a bit written in the scientific literature and in the popular press. This gives you a starting point but you are strongly advised to keep up with what is published. It will affect you! If you find a good article or book then please let me know and I will include it here.
Last modified on Friday June 22, 2001 9:29 AM by John Blake