| Letter | Explanation |
|---|---|
| f | failed Senate/Review Committee |
| + | disapproved in part by Committee |
| # | amended by Sen./Review Committee |
| a | approved by Chancellor's office |
| p | action pending from Chancellor's Office |
| t | action tabled by Senate |
| w | action withdrawn |
| * | modified by Chancellor's Office |
| ! | disapproved by Chancellor's Office |
| - | no signature/action required |
| o | approved; no objection received from Chancellor's Office |
| r | referred to Committee |
Evaluation of Administrators
FY88 Approve in principle an evaluation policy for academic administrators by faculty. (a,*) Meeting #04 FY90
Confirm membership on Administration Eval. Task Force. (-) Meeting #12
Discussion at special Senate meeting. (-) Establish policy for faculty role in admin. evaluation. (p) Meeting #19
Establish term appointments for deans and directors. (p) Meeting #19
Transition guidelines for evaluation policy. (p) Meeting #19
FY91 Motion to reconstitute the Task Force on Administrator Evaluation for the purpose of reconsidering the administrator evaluation proposal dated May 1990. (-) Meeting #20
Refer the term appointment motions vetoed by Chancellor O'Rourke to the reconstituted Task Force on Administrator Evaluation. (-) Meeting #20
Update on administrator evaluation policy. (-) Meeting #21
Motion to endorse the guidelines for Faculty Role in the Evaluation of Administrators. (a) Meeting #23
FY92 Report on Administrative Evaluation Process. (-) Meeting #29
FY93 Motion requesting the Administrative Committee aggressively pursue obtaining the evaluation of the VCAA and VCR from the university administration. (-) Meeting #37
FY94 Motion to amend policy on Administrator Evaluation. (referred back to committee) (r) Meeting #48
FY96 Motion to amend the guidelines for Faculty Role in the Evaluation of Administrators. (t) Meeting #61
FY99 Motion to recommend list of administrators for evaluation-Referred back to Committee (r) Meeting #87 Motion to recommend list of administrators for evaluation. (#a*) Meeting #88 Motion on Chancellor Evaluation Process. (a) Meeting #88 FY01 Motion recommending that the "Guidelines for the Evaluation Process for Administrators" be adopted. (referred back to committee for rewrite & resubmit) (see next entry) Meeting #97 Motion to recommend UAF Administrators be reviewed on a four year cycle according to Guidelines. (a) Meeting #99 FY03 Motion to amend the Guidelines for the Evaluation Process of Administrators. (a*) Meeting #111 Motion to amend the Administrator Review guidelines to establish a timeline and process for Group B Administrators. (a) Meeting #115 FY07 Motion to modify the Guidelines for the Evaluation Process of Administrators. (a*) Meeting #143 Motion to modify the "Guidelines for the Evaluation Process for Administrator (Group A) to add the Dean of Libraries and the Vice Chancellor for Research. (a) Meeting #138 Motion to suspend the Group B Administrators review for 2006-2007. (a) Meeting #138