EVOLUTION OF THE
COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
IN ALASKA
By Dr. Arthur S. Buswell
1930-1971
The Cooperative Extension Service was formally organized as a department
of the Alaska Agricultural College and School of Mines, later the University
of Alaska, on July 1, 1930.
PRE-EXTENSION PERIOD
A proper perspective of extension work in Alaska can best be obtained
by reviewing the history of the United States Department of Agriculture
work in the former territory. The earliest reference to this work is
found in a report by Secretary of Agriculture James Wilson:
The first appropriation "to enable the Secretary of Agriculture
to investigate and report to Congress upon the agricultural resources
of Alaska, with special reference to the desirability and feasibility
of the establishment of agricultural experiment stations in the Territory,"
became available July 1, 1897. The general supervision of the work under
the appropriation was assigned to the Director of the Office of Experiment
Stations.1
Special commissioners were sent to the coastal area and
islands of Alaska to make the investigations. The Secretary of Interior
also made available the services of the superintendent of Government
Schools in Alaska for collecting information on the agricultural possibilities
of the Yukon Valley. Reports submitted were so favorable that Congress
continued the appropriation for another year, and Professor C. C. Georgeson
was sent to Alaska to establish a headquarters for agricultural investigations.
The headquarters were located at Sitka in 1898. Then the Territorial
capital. Congress, as a result of Georgesons reports, authorized
the Secretary of Agriculture "to establish and maintain agricultural
experiment stations in Alaska, as well as to investigate the agricultural
resources and capabilities of the Territory,
."2 Land was
acquired at Sitka and a permanent headquarters established during the
summer of 1900. Secretary Wilson commented on the work in Alaska at
that time as follows: The problem which the Department has undertaken
to work out is to determine whether sufficient agriculture and horticulture
can be developed in Alaska to form an important subsidiary industry
to aid in the permanent development of mining, fisheries and lumbering,
which will undoubtedly be the leading industries of this region. If
all the food supplies of the population engaged in these industries
must be transported from the United States and Canada, it is evident
that the development of Alaska will be much slower and uncertain than
if a considerable portion of these supplies can be produced in the Territory
If our investigations should do nothing more than establish a sound
basis the growing of vegetables in little gardens about the cottages
of miners and fishermen in Alaska, they will make an adequate return
for the funds expended on them.3
The investigations resulted in sites being selected that seemed to have
agricultural possibilities and where future settlement appeared likely.
Experiment station farms were established in these areas and farming
was attempted. Seven stations were established between 1900 and 1915.
Only two of the original farms remain today, namely at Matanuska, in
the Matanuska Valley, and Fairbanks in the Tanana Valley.
The United States Department of agriculture defined these establishments
as experiment stations, although they would be more properly be termed
demonstration farms. Their major purpose was to determine what types
of agriculture could be carried out in the various parts of Alaska.
Seed was supplied to cooperating farmers and gardeners in return for
reports of their success or failure. Annual reports published from 1898
to 1931 make reference to farm demonstrations conducted, requests for
information replied to and bulletins and circulars published, in addition
to reporting the research projects.
The first publication appeared in 1902 under Georgeson authorship. Entitled
"Suggestions to Pioneer Farmers in Alaska," it was revised
in 1917 as Circular No. 1 with the title "Information for Prospective
Settlers in Alaska." Additional education bulletins issued during
this period were "Vegetable Growing in Alaska." 1905; "Cereal
Growing in Alaska," 1926; "Vegetable Gardening in Alaska,"
1928; and "The Potato in Alaska." 1929.
All Federally conducted agricultural work in Alaska between the years
1900 and 1930 was under the direction of the State Relations Service,
Office of Experiment Station, United States Department of Agriculture.
These pioneer agriculturists determined areas of potential agricultural
production and proved that farming and gardening were possible in Alaska.
They made available to early residents the types of services later carried
on by the Experiment Station and the Extension Service through the Land-grant
College.
Alaskas land-grant college dates from 1915. The cornerstone was
laid on July four of that year on land set aside by Congress for the
support of a Territorial College and School of Mines.
The Territorial Legislature by its Acts of May 3, 1917, accepted the
land grant and created a corporation, "The Alaska Agricultural
College and School of Mines," defining its duties and providing
for a Board of Trustees consisting of eight members.
The college opened for instruction on September 18, 1922...4 As long
as the Office of Experiment Stations, under the direct sponsorship of
the Federal Legislature, continued to support agricultural research
and informal education there was no reason to change the arrangement.
No concerted effort was made to have the terms of the Hatch or Smith-Lever
Acts extended to Alaska until the late 1920s when Federal support
had diminished to the point where only two of the original seven experiment
station farms remained active.
Congress, on February 23, 1929, passed legislation extending the benefits
of the Hatch Act establishing Experiment Stations and the Smith-Lever
Act providing for Cooperative Extension work in Agriculture and Home
Economics to Alaska. 5
The Act of February 23, 1929 was restrictive in that it did not provide
for financing of extension and research on the same basis as in the
States. Ernest Gruening, a former governor of Alaska, has pointed out
that: Congress had through the years enacted other acts further endowing
agricultural research and agricultural extension work in connection
with land-grant colleges. Despite the earnest efforts of Dr. Bunnell
and Alaskas delegates, these acts would not be made available
to Alaska for some years and then appropriations would be reduced from
the amounts authorized by law and enjoyed by the states. 6
Specifically, the Act limited funds for extension work to "Such
amount as the Secretary of Agriculture might determine." 7 Not
until 1949 were the full benefits of legislation authorizing Federal
appropriations for cooperative Extension work extended to Alaska.
EXTENSION SERVICE ESTABLISHED
The Territorial legislature accepted the terms of the Smith-Lever Act
on May 2, 1929, and designated the Alaska Agricultural College and School
of Mines as the college to administer Cooperative Extension work in
Agriculture and Home Economics in Alaska, but they did not appropriate
any funds for the work. The Secretary of agriculture made available
ten thousand dollars to enable the College to organize the new department
on July 1, 1930.
The founding of the Extension Service was reported in the October, 1930,
Extension Service Review. Excerpts from this account follow: At the
request of Dr. Charles E. Bunnell, President of the Alaska Agricultural
College and School of Mines, W. A. Lloyd, in charge of extension work
of the Western States, United States Department of Agriculture, was
sent to Alaska for two months to assist in organizing and starting the
new service. Mr. Lloyd arrived at the College June 25. President Bunnell
was appointed director of extension without compensation; George W.
Gasser, assistant director for agriculture; Mrs. Lydia O. Fohn-Hansen,
assistant director for home economics
. On the day the work was
started at the College three boys and girls 4-H extension
clubs were organized, one in gardening and two in sewing.
Early in July Mr. Gasser and Mrs. Fohn-Hansen accompanied by Mr. Lloyd,
left the college for their first field trip. Eklutna, Matanuska, Anchorage,
Seward, Juneau, Sitka, Ketchikan and Wrangell were visited and extension
work organized. Nine 4-H extension clubs were started, with 110 members
and 12 womens home economics clubs. Owing to the work being started
in mid-season, only preliminary work could be done in agriculture. Plans
were laid for another year. The clubs included in addition to the white
children a number of Eskimos, Aleuts, and Indians. Cooperative club
work was established at the industrial school in Eklutna and the Jessie
Lee Home at Seward. The club demonstrations are clothing, nutrition,
and gardening. The work with women consists of sewing, home management
and young-mothers clubs.
A few homesteaders are coming in each year and the foundations of organized
rural society are being laid. The extension field, both in home economics
and boys and girls clubs, is attractive, with possibilities
for considerable development.
In agriculture the work for a while necessarily will be largely to give
individual assistance to farmers or homesteaders and particularly to
help market crops through organization.
The Extension staff was enlarged in 1932 by addition of a veterinarian.
A full-time director was appointed in 1935. The assistant directors
and the veterinarian traveled throughout the Territory helping the settlers
in any way they could. Transportation was difficult and trips were long.
Communications were poor. Four-H and Homemaker clubs were established
but often disbanded for lack of extension personnel in the immediate
area to provide continued leadership, yet the program reached more and
more people each year and was well accepted.
Agricultural settlement in Alaska was greatly expanded in 1935 by action
of the Federal Government establishing the Matanuska Colony. Of the
formation of the colony, historian Hulley has written: In 1934 Harry
Hopkins, federal Relief Administrator in Washington, DC, and other federal
authorities, took up the idea of sponsoring a government-assisted colony
in Alaska. They felt that such a settlement would aid the territory,
supply foodstuffs for Alaska, serve as a step toward the possible defense
of the region, and above all give a new start to scores of families
from among the millions of farmers who were finding it almost impossible
to make a living in the United States.
The Matanuska Valley in south-central Alaska, some 45 miles northeast
of Anchorage, was finally selected by the federal administrators as
the most suitable area for the New Deal experiment.
In June 1934, federal agents made a hasty survey of the Matanuska Valley.
When their report was received in January 1935, the Federal Emergency
Relief Administration and the Department of Interior agreed jointly
to sponsor the settlement. 9
Colonists were selected from the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota,
in the belief that persons from these northern latitudes could more
easily adjust to the climate of Alaska. The first of 200 selected families
arrived in the Matanuska Valley in May of 1935 with the remainder following
in the early summer.
Establishment of the Matanuska Colony gave the Extension service an
opportunity to concentrate its effort and to prove its adaptability
to local situations. The home demonstration leader went immediately
to the colony where she remained all summer and fall working with the
women who were pioneering on the frontier wilderness. The Extension
Service director went on leave to work for the colony and later resigned
from Extension. The Extension Service director continued to work closely
with the colonists.
The Territorial and Federal governments took a greater interest in supporting
extension in Alaska as a result of the successful efforts of the small
extension staff in working with the colonists. Funds from both Territorial
and Federal sources were increased in the following biennium by approximately
35 percent.
The first Extension Service field office was opened in Palmer, in the
Matanuska Valley, in April of 1936. The office was staffed with an agricultural
agent, a home demonstration agent and a secretary. These agents worked
closely with the 200 colony families and the approximately 100 families
who had homesteaded in the valley previous to the establishment of the
colony, in helping them develop their farms and improve their living
conditions, and to develop youth programs through the medium of 4-H
clubs. This fact prompted the directors to write, in 1956, that, "In
a sense, agricultural extension work in Alaska has, since its first
beginnings in the Territory, concerned itself with what has recently
become known as the farm unit approach.10
Action taken by the United States Department of Agriculture in 1936
had a direct influence on the role of the Extension Service in the eyes
of the people. Production and Marketing Administration funds were made
available to Alaskan farmers for the Agricultural Conservation Program
and the Extension director was named administrator of the program in
Alaska. The Extension director was thus placed in charge of an action
program concerned with direct payments to farmers for carrying out certain
conservation practices on their farms. Not until 1952 was the Commodity
Stabilization Service, a successor to the Production and Marketing Administration,
put on a committee basis in Alaska with a separate "state"
chairman.
Establishment of the county and state Agricultural Stabilization and
Conservation Committees, with a federally appointed chairman, did not
separate this action program from the Extension Service as far as the
farmers were concerned. Confusion continues because Extension is still
required to furnish the committees with office space and clerical assistance
on a reimbursable basis. Persons seeking information concerning the
program come to the Extension office, which is also the Committee office,
and talk to extension personnel. The confusion in the minds of the people
is vividly illustrated in a book written by an Alaskan homesteader.
He said, "The Extension Service, a government agency which functioned
to help farmers, had paid me $40.00 for clearing the acre and it expected
me to use it for farming."11
The Hatch Act establishing the Agricultural Experiment Stations was
extended to Alaska in 1929. The Territory accepted the terms of the
Hatch Act in 1933, and ownership of the two remaining Federal Experiment
Station farms were transferred to the Alaska Agricultural College and
School of Mines. Research programs at these farms, located at Matanuska
and at College, were directed by superintendents appointed by the President
of the College.
The Alaska Agricultural College and School of Mines were charged, by
action of the Territorial legislature, to the University of Alaska in
1935. Two years later the University President moved to coordinate the
program of the two experiment station farms with each other and with
that of the Extension Service by appointment of a joint director with
headquarters on the campus.
Territorial appropriations for the Extension Service during the next
ten years increased and the organization gradually expanded. Permanent
field offices were opened in Juneau, Anchorage and Fairbanks and staffed
with home demonstration agents. A part-time 4-H State Leader was employed.
Emphasis was placed on the direct personal contact of agents with the
people to the extent that when the veterinarian resigned in 1938 no
full-time specialists were again employed until 1957.
THE POST WAR PERIOD
The Federal government took a real interest in Alaska from the standpoint
of military defense both during and following World War II. The only
landings of enemy troops on American soil were made at Kiska and Attu
in the Aleutian Islands. Following the war, as relations with Russia
became unfavorable, Alaskas location was considered the logical
site for military defense installations.
Military personnel agreed that Alaska would make a logical first line
of defense against Russia but suggested that if the enemy cut off supply
lines, troops stationed there might be rendered incapable of action
by a food shortage. Military leaders indicated a real concern for increasing
food production in the Territory. This concern led to another study
of Alaskas agricultural potential.
The Agriculture Subcommittee of the House Committee on Appropriations
initiated a provision in the 1947 Department of agriculture Appropriation
Act providing for a "nonrecurring, immediately available appropriation
of $20,000 to the Administrator, Agricultural Research Administration,
for special exploratory investigations of Alaska, to determine the basic
problems underlying potential agricultural development in appropriate
areas of Alaska, as a guide to the development of future agricultural
research in the region."12 The investigations were carried out
in the summer of 1946.
The following statement indicates that the concept of people in the
United States Department of Agriculture toward the role of agriculture
in the Territory had changed little from 1900. Most informed residents
of the State hold this same concept today. "Farming in Alaska was
considered in the exploratory investigation as an auxiliary to military,
transportation, mining, fisheries, forestry, and industrial development."13
The exploratory investigations and subsequent hearings resulted in Federal
legislation providing for an expanded agricultural research program
from the University of Alaska back to the USDA.
The United States Department of Agriculture developed a five-year plan
based on direct federal appropriations in addition to land grant and
Territorial funds. The direct appropriation by Congress to the Agricultural
Research Administration of the United States Department of Agriculture
for work in Alaska provided the wedge for assuming direction of the
program. A well-equipped physical plant including offices, laboratories
and staff houses was established at Palmer. These physical facilities
are still federally owned.
This action of the federal government dealt a severe blow to the Extension
Service for a number of reasons. The joint directorship of the Experiment
Station and the Cooperative Extension Service was terminated. A new
director was named to head the Experiment Station and the University
as Director of the Extension Service retained the former joint director.
Headquarters of the Experiment Station was moved to palmer, some 400
miles from the University campus and the University lost effective control
of the program. Professional persons employed by the Experiment Station
in the new program had federal civil service status without University
appointment. This action was interpreted by the people of Alaska as
indicating a lack of faith on the part of the federal government in
the leadership of the University of Alaska. This attitude was further
enhanced by the significant fact that, although a substantial increase
in funds was made available for research, no additional funds were made
available to the Extension Service for disseminating the results of
the research to farmers.
The 4-H and home economics programs of the Extension Service appear
to have survived this period without loss of prestige, largely because
of the personal respect which the people of the territory had for Mrs.
Lydia Fohn-Hansen who was Home Demonstration Leader and acting 4-H Leader
at the time.
FROM 1949 TO PRESENT
The outlook for extension improved somewhat in 1949 when, on October
27, Congress extended to Alaska the full benefits of legislation authorizing
federal appropriations for Cooperative Extension work. Thus, for the
first time federal funds were made available to Alaska on the same basis
that they were allocated to the states.
The Veterans on the Farm Training Program was developed after
the war to allow veterans to be paid a certain sum while learning to
farm on their own farms. The veteran had to attend regular classes and
follow acceptable farming practices. If the veteran met the requirements,
he was eligible for monthly payments while enrolled in the program.
The University of Alaska held the contract with the Veterans Administration
for administering the program in Alaska and assigned responsibility
to the director of the Extension Service.
Acceptance of the program appeared to have many advantages, but it also
had its disadvantages. Two new district agricultural agents positions
were established with the funds for this program and the increased appropriations,
which had become available in 1949. These agents were to spend half
of their time as veteran-on-the-farm training instructors and the other
half of their time as agricultural agents. The Alaska Extension Service
had again become involved in a program including payments to farmers.
The Veterans on the Farm Training Program came to an abrupt halt
in Alaska in the spring of 1952 with Veteran Administration charges
of abuse of the use of funds through payments to veterans not meeting
all the requirements. Charges and counter-charges were made, with the
result that as late as 1958 the Veterans Administration was forcing
many veterans to repay the money they had accepted in good faith through
Extension Service connected personnel. The program terminated in 1952.
The University administration became concerned, in 1951, about the lack
of leadership the University was exerting in the field of agriculture.
The research staff was successfully gathering facts needed by the rural
people but had little means of getting the information to them. University
and Experiment Station personnel held a number of conferences in the
winter and spring of 1951 and 1952. A representative of the United States
department of Agriculture joined in the final meetings. A plan for developing
the traditional land-grant college functions of resident teaching, extension
and research in agriculture was developed and approved by the University
of Alaska Board of Regents and the divisions concerned in the United
states Department of Agriculture.
The approved plan called for associate director of the Experiment Station
to add to his responsibilities those of Director of the Extension Service
and Dean of Agriculture. Equally important was the provision for joint
research-extension specialist and research-teaching appointments.
Changes in organization have resulted in a joint Extension Service-Experiment
Station director with no provision for a Dean of Agriculture. Five research
scientists continue to devote approximately 25% of their time to extension-specialist
activities. The Extension Service has also employed a full-time specialist
in the field of horticulture. A feeling of interdependence and a desire
for cooperation on the part of staff members have resulted in continued
good relations between the Experiment Station and the Extension Service.
The third side of the normal land-grant college triangle in the field
of agriculture, that of resident instruction, has been de-emphasized
since 1955 and the University of Alaska does not now offer a four year
undergraduate program in any area of agriculture. The Universitys
department of agriculture does offer a two year curriculum in the basic
sciences and the following advice to potential agricultural students:
"Students preparing themselves for an agricultural career are advised
to enroll for the first two years, recognizing the reservation that
their second two years of training will have to a be acquired at some
other institution."14
Very little work was carried on by the Cooperative Extension Service
in isolated villages of northern and western Alaska until early in 1956.
At that time funds were made available to the Extension Service by the
Alaska Rural Development Board, a territorial board established by the
legislature to evaluate the conditions in isolated villages and seek
solutions to village problems. An agricultural extension agent was employed
to develop a program of better living and community development in these
villages. From the beginning this agent and other staff members working
with him have fostered the development of 4-H Clubs, home gardening
and better nutrition. Federal "Special Needs" funds have been
available since 1956 to expand this program in the isolated villages.
The first state legislature meeting in 1959 abolished the Alaska Rural
Development Board but granted funds for isolated village work directly
to the Cooperative Extension Service.
Additional emphasis was placed on the youth program in 1957 by employment
of a full-time state 4-H Leader. This work is currently supported entirely
by federal "Special Needs" funds. 113 4-H Clubs has an enrollment
of 1182 boys and girls throughout Alaska in 1957. The enrollment rose
in 1958 to 1156 young people in 141 clubs. State programs include a
roundup on the University of Alaska campus in June. Four-H Club members
also compete for trips to Chicago to attend the National 4-H Club Congress
in the fall.
Headquarters of the Cooperative Extension Service is at the University
of Alaska, College, Alaska, which is near Fairbanks. The Director devotes
approximately 30% of his time to Extension. The remainder of his time
is occupied with duties as Director of the Universitys Agricultural
Experiment Station.
Direct responsibility for program and operation is delegated to an Associate
Director, who also is assigned duties in the academic program of the
University. The Associate Director is assisted by the State staff which
includes a Home Demonstration Leader 4-H Leader, an Administrative Assistant,
a Horticulturist and the Director of Information.
District Agricultural Agents are located in field offices at Fairbanks,
Palmer and Homer. District Home Demonstration Agents are located in
field offices at Fairbanks, Palmer, Anchorage, Homer and Juneau. Headquarters
for the isolated village district is on the University of Alaska campus.
A Home Demonstration Agent is employed during the summer months to work
in isolated villages in the area of Nome. A part-time assistant to the
Home Demonstration Agent in Juneau has an office in Ketchikan through
the cooperation of the Fisheries Products Research Laboratories. In
most cases the districts served by the offices are the areas adjacent
to the cities or towns in which the offices are located.
The Director and five research persons serving Extension as specialists
are located at the Experiment station headquarters in Palmer.
The total operating budget for fiscal 1960 amounts to $242,853 with$122,703
from federal sources and $120, 150 from state sources. This dollar for
dollar ratio in Alaska compares to the average for all land-grant colleges
of nearly $2.00 of state money for every dollar of federal money.
The United States Department of Agricultures field committee for
Alaska was established to evaluate agricultural needs in the Territory
and to advise the Secretary of Agriculture. Committee membership is
limited to heads of the United States Department of Agriculture branches
operative in Alaska.
The Extension Service Director participates actively in the semi-annual
meetings. This committee has been effective in fostering cooperation
among federal agricultural agencies in Alaska at the state level.
The close association with the agricultural Stabilization and Conservation
Committees, through their use of Extension facilities has been noted.
In addition the Extension Director serves on the state committee, and
the agricultural agents serve on the local committees.
Cooperative working arrangements have been maintained with the Soil
Conservation Service in the field through district agricultural agents
having ex officio membership on local soil conservation district boards.
Cooperation at the state level is assured through the Extension Director
who is a member of the Alaska Soil Conservation District Advisory Committee.
Relations with other federal and state agencies are good. These relations
are generally informal and based on professional and personal relationships
of the individuals involved, and the strong desire of most of the people
to use their resources in accomplishing the greatest overall gains for
Alaska.
Continued development of Alaska, as a state will bring many more people
who will have to learn to adjust to the North Country. These people
will also have to be fed, clothed and housed. The Cooperative Extension
Service has been developing for 29 years in Alaska. The Service reached
a degree of maturity that will enable it to help both the old and new
residents achieve the goals of orderly development of the State and
a good life for themselves and their families.Cooperative Extension
Work in Agriculture and Home Economics
A.H. Mick, Director
University of Alaska and US Department of Agriculture, Cooperating
Printed and distributed under acts of Congress, May 8 and June 30, 1914
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1 US, Secretary of Agriculture, Annual Report for 1898 (Washington:
US Government Printing Office, 1898), pp. 116-117.
2 US, Secretary of Agriculture, Annual Report for 1900 (Washington:
US Government Printing Office, 1900), pp. 59
3 Ibid. p. 61
4 University of Alaska, University of Alaska Catalog, 1957-1958, Second
Series, No. 23 (Los Angeles, California: Anderson, Ritchie and Simon,
1957, p. 5
5 Handbook, Agricultural Extension Service, University of Alaska (College
Alaska, 1955), p. 2. (Mimeographed)
6 Ernest Gruening, The State of Alaska (New Your: Random House, Inc.,
1954), p. 278.
7 "Extension Work in Alaska," Extension Service Review, I
(Washington: USDA, Government Printing Office, October 1930), No. 6,
p. 93.
8 Ibid.
9 Clarence C. Hulley, Alaska, 1741-1953 (Portland, Oregon: Binfords
& Mort, 1957), P. 323.
10 Allan H. Mick, Arthur S. Buswell, and Lydia Fohn-Hansen, Annual Narrative
Report of the Director of Extension, January 1-December 31, 1956 (College,
Alaska), p. 13.
11 Gordon Stoddard, Go North, Young Man (Portland, Oregon: Binfords
& Mort, 1957), p. 146.
12 Agricultural Research Administration, USDA, Report on Exploratory
Investigations of Agricultural Problems of Alaska, Miscellaneous Publications
no 700 (Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1949). p. 1-2.
13 Ibid. p.2
14 University of Alaska, University of Alaska Catalog, 1959-60, Second
Series, No. 25 (Lancaster, Pennsylvania: Intelligence Printing Co.,
1959), p. 86