Understanding Organic Chemistry in the World Around You
Purpose:
Present a current event or issue to the class that has relevance to organic chemistry.
Format: Choose one of the following:
- Poster Session
(you may work separately or in groups of 2-3): Select a current event or topic from a newspaper or magazine. Design a poster to illustrate the topic. Posters will be displayed during class time (check syllabus for date). One author must stand next to the poster during this time to present it to interested classmates. Additional group members will spend the time evaluating other student’s posters.
Posters should be organized as follows :
- Title:
The title should be informative and interesting. (Author’s names are typically listed after the title).
- Introduction:
Identify what the topic is and why it is of interest.
- Body:
Explain basic chemistry related to the topic and explain why this chemistry is relevant. Showing molecular structures is one way to incorporate basic chemistry into the presentation. Clearly describe the issue and suggest how it may effect the general public now and in the future.
- Conclusion:
Summarize in bullet format the issues and content of the poster.
- Discussion:
State your opinions on the topic.
- References:
Cite at least 1 chemistry text book and 2 articles from popular periodicals.
- Acknowledgements:
Describe what contribution each group member made to the project. Thank anyone else who contributed to the project.
- Posters will be evaluated as follows (bullet format works best):
This assignment is worth 100 points. Both the instructor and your peers will evaluate your performance. Half of the grade will be determined by peer review and the other half via evaluation by the instructor. YOU MAY NOT EVALUATE YOUR OWN POSTER. One author must present the poster to interested peers and be available to answer questions. All students not presenting posters will be asked to evaluate other student’s posters. All students not participating in the panel discussion will be asked to evaluate the discussion.
Poster Review
|
I. Title: Does it inform you of the contents of the poster? |
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
|
II. Introduction: Is an issue or question clearly identified and defined? |
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
|
III. Body (content and presentation): |
|
- Did one of the authors explain the poster and answer questions?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- Are aspects of basic organic chemistry explained?
|
0 - 30 _______ |
|
If yes, check which of the following apply: |
|
|
____Molecular structure |
|
|
____Identification of functional groups
|
|
|
____Other |
|
- Can you understand the poster?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- Is it clear how this topic may affect the general public?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
|
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- Is the poster esthetically pleasing? (minimum size is 3x5 ft; text should be large enough to read from 3 ft away, sections should be identified with subheadings, text should be original; not Xeroxed).
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
|
IV. Conclusion: |
|
- Is the body summarized with a few bullets?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- Are the conclusions objective (free of opinions)?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
|
V. Discussion: Is an informed opinion clearly stated? |
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
|
VI. References: Are at least 2 periodicals (magazine, newspaper or scientific journal) and 1 reference book cited? Do references cited add depth to the presentation?
_____periodical #1 ____periodical #2 ____reference book
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
|
VII. Acknowledgements: If more than one author, are each members name and contributions listed? Check the name of each author who made a significant contribution: (Automatic 10 pts if only 1 author)
_____Author #1 (name)______________________
_____Author #2 (name)______________________
_____Author #3 (name)______________________
Comments: |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Total _____________________ |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Signature of Reviewer:__________________ Printed name:______________________
- Panel Discussion:
A minimum of 9 people must participate and agree on a topic that can be presented for debate in front of a mock congressional panel, borough assembly etc. Participants will divide into 3 groups. Two groups should take opposing points of view and the third group should serve as moderators, congressional representatives or assembly members (or whatever is appropriate). Some members of the two opposing sides should play the role of expert witnesses. Members in the third group must summarize their conclusions verbally at the end of the discussion and in writing (written portions will be handed-in). The panel discussion will be held on the same day as the poster session. We will have time for only 1 group and topic.
- Panel Discussions will be evaluated according to the following criteria:
Is the format clearly explained and convincing?
Is the purpose of the discussion clearly stated?
With regard to groups presenting opposing opinions: Is the basic chemistry necessary to address the topic explained well enough to understand? Is the chemistry relevant to the topic? Are points clearly stated and supported by evidence? Do "experts" explain things clearly and make rational arguments?
With regard to panel (group 3): Are conclusions decisive and logically based on evidence presented? Does summary of conclusion have sufficient depth to illustrate all sides of the issue? Was each point of view considered?
Panel Review
Panel Topic:_________________________________________ Date:___________
- Is the issue clearly defined?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- Does each participant relate a basic aspect of organic chemistry to the topic?
If yes, check which of the following apply:
___Molecular structure
___Identification of functional groups
___Other? ________________ |
0 - 30 _____ |
- Is the basic chemistry explained well enough for you to understand?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
- Is the chemistry relevant to the topic?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- Is it clear how the issue affects the public?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- Are points clearly stated and supported by evidence?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- Do experts explain things clearly and make rational arguments?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
|
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
|
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- Are conclusions decisive and logically based on evidence presented?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
- Do conclusions have sufficient depth to illustrate all sides of the issue? Was each point of view considered?
|
0 1 2 3 4 5 |
- References: Did each participant provide at least 3 references and either show references on an overhead or pass out copies of a list of references to the class.
___ Periodical #1 (magazine, newspaper or journal)
___ Periodical #2 (magazine, newspaper or journal)
___ Text book #1 (text or reference book) |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
- Acknowledgments: Check the name of each participant who made a significant contribution?
___ participant #1 (name)________________
___ participant #2 (name)________________
___ participant #3 (name)________________
___ participant #4 (name)________________
___ participant #5 (name)________________
___ participant #6 (name)________________ |
participant #7 (name)________________
participant #8 (name)________________
participant #9 (name)________________ |
Comments (use back of page if necessary): Total Score:______________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature of Reviewer:__________________ Printed name:______________________
Potential Poster Topics (focus on the aspect of the topic that interests you and but highlight organic molecules related to the topic. Showing molecules and identifying functional groups with tie chemistry to the topic:
- Alzheimer's (Newsweek, Jan 31, 2000) One idea is to focus on drugs used to treat Alzheimer's
- Will Tribal Knowledge Survive the Millennium? (Science, Jan 7, 2000, vol 287, pg 44-45).
- Methamphetamine on the rise!
- Cure for the common cold.
- Trans fatty acids Time (July 5, 1999)
- Gulf war syndrome and pyridostigmine bromide (FDNM, 10/19/00)
- Fairbanks Natural Gas - What's up?
- What is happening to the ozone? Should chlorofluorocarbons be banned?
- What is in a ski wax and which one should I use?
- What is happening with plastic recycling in Alaska (K&K recycling)?
- A Fireproof Future? Plastics that don't burn (Science News, vol. 155, 1/16/99)
- The Latest on Ritalin (Time, 11/30/98)
- Life's First Scalding Steps: Biology might have begun in cauldrons at the bottom of the sea (Science News, vol. 155, 1/9/99)
- Rapid detox of heroin addicts (Br. J. Intensive Care, 1997, vol. 7, 66-69)
- Marijuana Use and Mortality (American Journal of Public Health, 1997, 5, 7-29)
- Nanotubes
- Was there life on Mars?
- The Mood Molecule (Time, 9/29/97)
- Viagra: Better erections through chemistry (Time, 5/4/98)
- Is sunscreen bad for your health?
- Nicotine, is it addicting? (Newsweek, 11/4/96)
- Should Marijuana be available by prescription?
- Anti-aging creams, what are they? (alpha hydroxy acids, retinol...$$$$)
- Alzheimer's Unlocking the Mystery, Newsweek p46-51, Jan 31, 2000)
- Cancers pick up GLUT of Vitamin C, (Science News, Oct 2, 1999)
- Study: High toxin levels found in killer whales (FDNM June 6, 1999)
- Bifunctional molecule may help protect brain from stroke damage (C&E News , p44, Sept 20, 1999)
- Hatching a better egg (FDNM, C-1, May 15, 1999)
- Margarine Misgivings (Time p63, July 5, 1999)
- Vision Saver (Time p117, Nov 29, 1999)
- Study Links gene to pain sensitivity (FDNM A-5, July 20, 1999)
- Viagra for the thighs? Time p72-73, May 10, 1999)
- More than the Brain's Drain (Science News vol 155, p58-59, Jan 23, 1999)
- How Good is E.R.'s Rx? (Time p74, June 1, 1998)
- Cold viruses enter cells without knocking (Science News vol. 153, p263, April 25, 1998)
- State monitors find no traces of radiation from Japan accident (FDNM B-1 Oct 6, 1999)
- Redefining Dioxins (Science News vol 155 p156-158, March 6, 1999
- New study links Gulf war syndrome to drug (FDNM A-1, Oct 19, 1999)
- Your choice, however, instructor approval is recommended
Potential Topics for Panel Discussion:
???? Suggest Ideas????